Misperception among physicians and patients regarding the risks and benefits of statin treatment: the potential role of direct-to-consumer advertising

Background Statins are commonly used to reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Despite the benefit and limited risks in properly identified patients, clinicians are often challenged by patient acceptance and adherence to these medications. Objectives To assess if patients and physicians may h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical lipidology Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 51 - 57
Main Authors Kon, Rachel H., MD, Russo, Mark W., MD, Ory, Bridget, MD, Mendys, Phil, PharmD, Simpson, Ross J., MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Statins are commonly used to reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Despite the benefit and limited risks in properly identified patients, clinicians are often challenged by patient acceptance and adherence to these medications. Objectives To assess if patients and physicians may have unfounded safety concerns about hepatotoxicity from these medications, we surveyed physicians and patients. Results We found inconsistent liver function–monitoring practices as well as exaggerated fears of statin-induced hepatotoxicity. Patients who received risk information from their physician were more likely to accurately estimate hepatotoxic risk than patients receiving such information from other sources. Conclusions We believe these misperceptions about the relative risk and benefits of statin therapy are propagated by direct-to-consumer advertising, which may emphasize potential adverse events relative to treatment benefits. These perceptions are likely to adversely affect statin adherence, and may be addressed by patient education.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1933-2874
1876-4789
DOI:10.1016/j.jacl.2008.01.002