Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Utilization and Its Outcomes in Korea: Data from Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry

BACKGROUNDThere are sparse data on the utilization rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and its beneficial effects in Korean patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODSAmong 5,625 acute heart failure (AHF) patients from 10 tertiary univ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Korean medical science Vol. 35; no. 46; p. e397
Main Authors Cho, Youngjin, Cho, Sang-Yeong, Oh, Il-Young, Lee, Ji Hyun, Park, Jin Joo, Lee, Hae-Young, Kim, Kye Hun, Yoo, Byung-Su, Kang, Seok-Min, Baek, Sang Hong, Jeon, Eun-Seok, Kim, Jae-Joong, Cho, Myeong-Chan, Chae, Shung Chull, Oh, Byung-Hee, Choi, Dong-Ju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 30.11.2020
대한의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUNDThere are sparse data on the utilization rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and its beneficial effects in Korean patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODSAmong 5,625 acute heart failure (AHF) patients from 10 tertiary university hospitals across Korea, 485 patients with reassessed LVEF ≤ 35% at least 3 months after the index admission were enrolled in this study. The ICD implantation during the follow-up was evaluated. Mortality was compared between patients with ICDs and age-, sex-, and follow-up duration matched control patients. RESULTSAmong 485 patients potentially indicated for an ICD for primary prevention, only 56 patients (11.5%) underwent ICD implantation during the follow-up. Patients with ICD showed a significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with their matched control population: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 0.39 (0.16-0.92), P = 0.032. The mortality rate was still lower in the ICD group after excluding patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.09 [0.01-0.63], P = 0.015). According to the subgroup analysis for ischemic heart failure, there was a significantly lower all-cause mortality in the ICD group than in the no-ICD group (HR [95% CI] = 0.20 [0.06-0.72], P = 0.013), with a borderline statistical significance (interaction P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONFollow-up data of this large, multicenter registry suggests a significant under-utilization of ICD in Korean heart failure patients with reduced LVEF. Survival analysis implies that previously proven survival benefit of ICD in clinical trials could be extrapolated to Korean patients. TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01389843.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Youngjin Cho and Sang-Yeong Cho contributed equally to this work.
https://www.jkms.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e397&code=0063JKMS&vmode=FULL
ISSN:1011-8934
1598-6357
DOI:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e397