Do Histological Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children Correlate With Peripheral Eosinophils?

ABSTRACT Aim: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease of the esophagus. We investigate whether peripheral eosinophils can be a good indicator of esophageal eosinophilia and whether they correlate with histological findings, such as basilar hyperplasia, spongiosis,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition Vol. 70; no. 5; pp. 604 - 607
Main Authors Choudhury, Shelly, Kozielski, Rafal, Hua, Jia, Wilding, Gregory E., Baker, Susan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology 01.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Aim: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease of the esophagus. We investigate whether peripheral eosinophils can be a good indicator of esophageal eosinophilia and whether they correlate with histological findings, such as basilar hyperplasia, spongiosis, microabscesses, number of lymphocytes, and number of neutrophils. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with EoE patients ages <18 years after obtaining IRB approval. Biopsies obtained from 57 EoE patients were analyzed. Patient demographics, symptoms; complete blood count with differentials obtained at the time of endoscopies or within a month of the procedure, were documented. Results: A significant correlation was observed between peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and peak esophageal eosinophil count (P value: 0.0009). Subjects with biopsies suggestive of ongoing disease activity or active status had a higher mean of AEC at 577.41 ± 202.60 compared with subjects with inactivity with mean of 305.26 ± 526.67. However, when the subjects were broadly divided with 500 AEC as a cut off (<500 and >500 AEC), it was found that, out of 27 EoE inactive patients, 24 had AEC count less than or equal to 500 and out of 66 EoE active patients, 32 had AEC more than 500. Conclusion: Active EoE status meant a higher mean of AEC compared with inactive status; but AEC was not found to be a sensitive tool for detecting active EoE.
Bibliography:Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award Number UL1TR001412. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-2116
1536-4801
DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002646