How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: a study of CEO effects in three countries

Do CEOs matter more in some countries than in others? Based on a theoretical consideration of three fundamental national-level institutions--national values, prevailing firm ownership structures, and board governance arrangements--we argue that CEOs in different countries face systematically differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStrategic management journal Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 767 - 789
Main Authors Crossland, Craig, Hambrick, Donald C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.08.2007
John Wiley and Sons
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Do CEOs matter more in some countries than in others? Based on a theoretical consideration of three fundamental national-level institutions--national values, prevailing firm ownership structures, and board governance arrangements--we argue that CEOs in different countries face systematically different degrees of constraint or their latitudes of action, and hence they differ in how much effect they have on firm performance. To test these ideas, we apply a variance components analysis methodology to 15-year matched samples of 100 U.S. firms, 100 German firms, and 100 Japanese firms. Results provide strong robust evidence that the effect of CEOs on firm performance--for good and for ill--is substantially greater in U.S. firms than in German and Japanese firms.
Bibliography:istex:FB144A8E72BAA1F09228838EF99CCB05410C4013
ArticleID:SMJ610
ark:/67375/WNG-VBTM9MMV-K
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.610