Efficacy of Physical Therapy on Nociceptive Pain Processing Alterations in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 21; no. 10; pp. 2502 - 2517
• Main Authors: Arribas-Romano, Alberto, Fernández-Carnero, Josué, Molina-Rueda, Francisco, Angulo-Diaz-Parreño, Santiago, Navarro-Santana, Marcos José
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Chronic pain; Chronic Pain - therapy; Clinical trials; Humans; Manipulative therapy; Meta-analysis; Musculoskeletal diseases; Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy; Nociception; Nociceptive Pain; Pain; Pain perception; Patients; Physical therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities; Statistical analysis; Systematic review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Therapeutics, Experimental; Therapeutics, Physiological; Spain
• ISSN: 1526-2375; 1526-4637
• DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz366

Abstract Introduction Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a major health, social, and economic problem. Most of the subjects who suffer from chronic musculoskeletal pain present processes of central sensitization. Temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation are the two most commonly used clinical measures of this. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effects of physical therapy on temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBSCO, PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Collaboration Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and SCOPUS databases. Different mesh terms and key words were combined for the search strategy, with the aim of encompassing all studies that have used any type of physical therapy treatment in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and have measured both TS and CPM. Results Eighteen studies remained for qualitative analysis and 16 for quantitative analysis. Statistically significant differences with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained for TS (–0.21, 95% CI = –0.39 to –0.03, Z = 2.50, P = 0.02, N = 721) and CPM (0.34, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.56, Z = 2.99, P = 0.003, N = 680) in favor of physical therapy as compared with control. Manual therapy produces a slight improvement in TS, and physical therapy modalities in general improve CPM. No significant differences between the subgroups of the meta-analysis were found. The methodological quality of the studies was high. Conclusions Physical therapy produces a slight improvement in central sensitization (CS)–related variables, with TS decreased and CPM increased when compared with a control group in patients with CMP. Only significant differences in TS were identified in the manual therapy subgroup.