The effects of ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification on the fatigue performance of 3D-printed Ti64

•Ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification (UNSM) were used to process 3D-printed metals.•Better surface finish, lower subsurface porosity were observed after UNSM treatment.•Tensile residual stresses were changed to compressive after UNSM treatment.•Significant improvement in fatigue performance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of fatigue Vol. 103; pp. 136 - 146
Main Authors Zhang, Hao, Chiang, Richard, Qin, Haifeng, Ren, Zhencheng, Hou, Xiaoning, Lin, Dong, Doll, Gary L., Vasudevan, Vijay K., Dong, Yalin, Ye, Chang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2017
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification (UNSM) were used to process 3D-printed metals.•Better surface finish, lower subsurface porosity were observed after UNSM treatment.•Tensile residual stresses were changed to compressive after UNSM treatment.•Significant improvement in fatigue performance was observed. 3D-printed metals have great potential for application in the biomedical and the aerospace industries. Unfortunately, they suffer from poor surface finish, high porosity, and high tensile residual stresses, leading to inferior mechanical properties as compared with traditional cast or wrought metals. In this study, we introduce an innovative method, ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification (UNSM), for the processing of a 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The surface finish, microstructure, residual stresses and mechanical properties of the samples before and after UNSM treatment were characterized and compared. It was found that the UNSM treatment resulted in much better surface finish, lower subsurface porosity, and a high magnitude of compressive residual stresses, leading to significant improvement in rotation bending fatigue performance.
ISSN:0142-1123
1879-3452
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.019