PROOF Trial: Protection from Pulmonary Embolism with the OptEase Filter

Purpose A postmarketing surveillance registry was conducted to monitor the safety and effectiveness of the OptEase vena cava filter when used as a permanent filter. Materials and Methods This study was a nonrandomized, multicenter prospective trial with all patients receiving the OptEase vena cava f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vascular and interventional radiology Vol. 19; no. 8; pp. 1165 - 1170
Main Authors Ziegler, J. Werner, MD, Dietrich, Gary J., MD, Cohen, Sidney A., MD, PhD, Sterling, Keith, MD, Duncan, James, MD, Samotowka, Michael, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose A postmarketing surveillance registry was conducted to monitor the safety and effectiveness of the OptEase vena cava filter when used as a permanent filter. Materials and Methods This study was a nonrandomized, multicenter prospective trial with all patients receiving the OptEase vena cava filter for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). A total of 11 clinical sites in the United States enrolled patients. A 1-month postimplantation follow-up examination was performed to determine potential filter migration and the presence of symptomatic thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC) or lower extremities. At 6-month postimplantation follow-up, patients were again assessed for the safety and stability of the filter and any clinical evidence of symptomatic thrombosis. Results One hundred fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-five patients (36.6%) were unable to complete all of the necessary follow-up at 6 months. At 1 month, filter migration and filter-related symptomatic deep vein thrombosis was observed in one patient each (0.9% and 0.8%, respectively). At 6 months, no new cases of filter migration or filter-related symptomatic thrombosis were observed. Filter tilting (≥15° off the IVC axis) was observed in one patient at baseline (0.7%), four patients at 1-month follow-up (3.6%), and three patients (11.4%) at 6-month follow-up. Incidental findings on follow-up radiographs included filter fracture in two patients (1.8%) at 1 month and in one additional patient (4.3%) at 6 months. There were no clinical sequelae associated with the filter fracture. Conclusions The co-primary endpoints of filter migration and symptomatic thrombus formation at 1 month had an observed frequency of 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively. These co-primary endpoints were stable and unchanged at 6 months.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1051-0443
1535-7732
DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.020