Ruby laser-assisted hair removal reduces the coarseness of regrowing hairs: fallacy or fact?

• Published in: British journal of plastic surgery Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 380 - 384
• Main Authors: Liew, S.H., Ladhani, K., Grobbelaar, A.O., Gault, D.T., Sanders, R., Green, C.J., Linge, C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.1999; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hair - anatomy & histology; Hair - growth & development; Hair - radiation effects; Hair Removal - methods; Humans; Laser Therapy; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); ruby laser, hair removal; Scalp; ruby laser, hair removal; Cosmetic; Human; Treatment; Ex vivo; Biopsy; Laser; Regrowth; Technique; Ruby; Diameter; Depilation; Result
• ISSN: 0007-1226; 1465-3087
• DOI: 10.1054/bjps.1998.0145

There have been anecdotal reports that hairs that regrow after ruby laser-assisted hair removal are finer in appearance. If true, this phenomenon adds to the improved aesthetic effect of laser treatment of unwanted hair. It is the aim of this study to determine whether this phenomenon indeed occurs, and if so, assess its permanence and its mode of action. In this prospective clinical study, 71 patients with 94 treatment sites were treated with the Chromos 694 Depilation Ruby Laser. Hair diameter was measured pre-treatment, and at 3 and 7 months post-treatment. In addition, ex vivo scalp skin was used to assess if the ruby laser selectively damaged coarser hairs. Laser-treated and matched untreated skin samples were histologically assessed and the diameters of hair shafts (normal or obviously damaged) were measured. Results of this study were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the hair diameter of non-lasered specimens and the hair diameter of the normal hair in lasered specimens. However, a statistically significant difference was seen between the hair diameter of non-lasered specimens and diameters of damaged hair in lasered specimens (P< 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference (P< 0.05) between pre-treatment and 3 month hair diameters, but no statistically significant difference was found between pre-treatment and 7 month hair diameters. In conclusion, ruby laser-assisted hair removal results in a temporary reduction in hair diameter of regrowing hair. This is not due to the selective targeting of larger hair follicles.