Longitudinal Health-Related Quality of Life Study among Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 10; no. 2; p. 226
• Main Authors: Pasek, Małgorzata, Suchocka, Lilia, Osuch-Pęcak, Grażyna, Muzykiewicz, Konrad, Iwańska, Ewa, Kaducakowa, Helena, Goździalska, Anna, Goździalska, Magdalena
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 10.01.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Anxiety; Bioethics; Cancer therapies; Cervical cancer; Chemotherapy; Clinical medicine; Decision making; Hospitals; Insomnia; Longitudinal studies; Mental depression; Morbidity; Oncology; Patients; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Radiation therapy; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Womens health; Poland; radiotherapy; longitudinal study; quality of life; cervical cancer
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020226

Quality of life studies in medicine, particularly in oncology, have become a basic tool used to assess patient's performance in different types of cancer and different modalities of treatment. The aim of this study was a subjective evaluation of the quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The study has a longitudinal character and comprises four stages: before treatment, at the end of treatment, 5 months and 5 years after treatment. Standardized questionnaires such as EORTC QoL C30, HADS (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life C30 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and the authors demographic-clinical assessment survey were the study tools. Physical functioning was assessed as the highest before treatment and depreciated to the lowest value 5 years after treatment. Emotional functioning was the lowest before treatment and then decreased again in the fourth stage of the assessment. Global quality of life was the lowest in the fourth stage of the study. Memory and concentration were fairly good at every stage of the study, with the highest score at the end of the treatment. At stages 3 and 4, the respondent's social functioning was the best, followed by the ability to fulfil their social role. General health and quality of life were assessed by the respondents on a level slightly above average, though five years after treatment the score was slightly below average.