Shift in representation and symbolisation of affective experience: A paradoxical outcome in therapy

Defining outcome represents a key challenge for psychotherapy theory, research and practice. The present paper uses a case study of a client with anorexia nervosa to contribute to the development of conceptual understanding of the nature of paradoxical outcome. In this case, different sources of out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 177 - 200
Main Authors Thoresen, Lars Henrik Kaasen, Thørnquist, Hans Hella, Stänicke, Erik, Mcleod, John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 03.04.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Defining outcome represents a key challenge for psychotherapy theory, research and practice. The present paper uses a case study of a client with anorexia nervosa to contribute to the development of conceptual understanding of the nature of paradoxical outcome. In this case, different sources of outcome data offered different answers to the question of whether or not the therapy had been successful. Qualitative thematic analysis of therapy transcriptions was carried out, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Both the process of change that occurred in this case, and the conflicting outcome indicators, could be explained in terms of a model of affect elaboration. These findings are discussed in terms of the need for caution when interpreting results from outcome measures in psychotherapy research and practice.
ISSN:1364-2537
1469-5901
DOI:10.1080/13642537.2021.1923048