Diagnosing the Outflow from the SGR 1806–20 Giant Flare with Radio Observations

On 2004 December 27, the soft gamma repeater (SGR) 1806-20 emitted the brightest giant flare (GF) ever detected from an SGR. This burst of energy, which resulted in an (isotropic) energy release 6100 times greater than the only two other known SGR GFs, was followed by a very bright, fading radio aft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Astrophysical journal Vol. 638; no. 1; pp. 391 - 396
Main Authors Granot, J, Ramirez-Ruiz, E, Taylor, G. B, Eichler, D, Lyubarsky, Y. E, Wijers, R. A. M. J, Gaensler, B. M, Gelfand, J. D, Kouveliotou, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL IOP Publishing 10.02.2006
University of Chicago Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:On 2004 December 27, the soft gamma repeater (SGR) 1806-20 emitted the brightest giant flare (GF) ever detected from an SGR. This burst of energy, which resulted in an (isotropic) energy release 6100 times greater than the only two other known SGR GFs, was followed by a very bright, fading radio afterglow. Extensive follow-up radio observations provided a wealth of information with unprecedented astrometric precision, revealing the temporal evolution of the source size, along with densely sampled light curves and spectra. Here we expand on our previous work on this source, by explaining these observations within one self-consistent dynamical model. In this scenario, the early radio emission is due to the outflow ejected during the GF energizing a thin shell surrounding a preexisting cavity, where the observed steep temporal decay of the radio emission seen beginning on day 9 is attributed to the adiabatic cooling of the shocked shell. The shocked ejecta and external shell move outward together, driving a forward shock into the ambient medium, and are eventually decelerated by a reverse shock. As we show in a separate work by Gelfand and coworkers, the radio emission from the shocked external medium naturally peaks when significant deceleration occurs and then decays relatively slowly. The dynamical modeling of the collision between the ejecta and the external shell, together with the observed evolution of the source size (which is nicely reproduced in our model), suggests that most of the energy in the outflow was in mildly relativistic material, with an initial expansion velocity v/c d sub(15)(1 + d super(2) sub(15)) super(-1/2) 6 0.7, for a distance of 15d sub(15) kpc to SGR 1806-20. An initially highly relativistic outflow would not have produced a long coasting phase at a mildly relativistic expansion velocity, as was observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.1086/497680