Analytical solution on vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry considering clogging effects

This paper aims to establish an analytical model on vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry treated by PVD with special considerations on the clogging effects. A series of laboratory tests have been conducted to characterize the temporal/spatial variations of the clogging zone and the vacuum pressure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeotextiles and geomembranes Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 842 - 851
Main Authors Zhou, Yuefu, Wang, Peng, Shi, Li, Cai, Yuanqiang, Wang, Jun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Essex Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper aims to establish an analytical model on vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry treated by PVD with special considerations on the clogging effects. A series of laboratory tests have been conducted to characterize the temporal/spatial variations of the clogging zone and the vacuum pressure in soil. Based on the nonlinear relationship between the compressibility, the permeability and the void ratio (e-p and e-k curves), an analytical model incorporating the clogging zone was proposed and solved considering the nonlinear attenuation of the vacuum pressure. The solution was verified and validated by comparing with published data and field test results, respectively. Parametric studies reveal that the clogging significantly slows down the consolidation rate, and thus reduces the final degree of consolidation of the dredged slurry. •Formation time and permeability of clogging zone of dredged slurry are determined by laboratory test.•A vacuum transfer model with varying attenuation coefficients within/out the clogging zone is proposed.•An analytical solution considering clogging effects on vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry is obtained.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0266-1144
1879-3584
DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.013