Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin – A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The efficacy of gabapentin (GPT) and pregabalin (PGB) in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was assessed. We screened MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, www.clinicaltrials.org, the Cochrane Library (through October 2008), and the reference sections of original studies on GPT/PGB in FMS. Randomized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain (Amsterdam) Vol. 145; no. 1-2; pp. 69 - 81
Main Authors Häuser, Winfried, Bernardy, Kathrin, Üçeyler, Nurcan, Sommer, Claudia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Elsevier B.V 01.09.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The efficacy of gabapentin (GPT) and pregabalin (PGB) in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was assessed. We screened MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, www.clinicaltrials.org, the Cochrane Library (through October 2008), and the reference sections of original studies on GPT/PGB in FMS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of FMS with GPT and PGB were analyzed. Six out of 127 RCTs studying 2422 subjects on treatment with GPT (one study) or PGB (five studies) and 1056 subjects on placebo with a median treatment duration of 11weeks were included into the systematic review. Five studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Effects were summarized using standardized mean differences (SMD). There was strong evidence for a reduction of pain (SMD -0.28, 95% CI −0.36, −0.20; p<0.001), improved sleep (SMD −0.39, 95% CI −0.48, −0.39; p<0.001), and improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (SMD −0.30, 95% CI −0.46, −0.15; p<0.001), but not for depressed mood (SMD −0.12, 95% CI −0.30, 0.06; p=0.18). There was strong evidence for a non-substantial reduction of fatigue (SMD −0.16, 95% CI −0.23, −0.09, p<0.001) and of anxiety (SMD −0.18, 95% CI −0.27, −0.10; p<0.001). The external validity of the studies was limited because patients with severe somatic and mental disorders were excluded.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0304-3959
1872-6623
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.014