Effect of vacuum removal on consolidation settlement under a combined vacuum and surcharge preloading

• Published in: Geotextiles and geomembranes Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 12 - 22
• Main Authors: Ni, Pengpeng, Xu, Kai, Mei, Guoxiong, Zhao, Yanlin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Essex Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2019; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Consolidation; Fees & charges; Geostatics; Geosynthetics; Impact analysis; Land reclamation; Minor principal stress direction; Pressure effects; Roads & highways; Settlement; Unloading; Vacuum and surcharge preloading; Vacuum removal; Vacuum technology; China; Unloading; Geosynthetics; Vacuum and surcharge preloading; Settlement; Vacuum removal; Minor principal stress direction
• ISSN: 0266-1144; 1879-3584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.004

The combined vacuum and surcharge preloading technique is extensively used to accelerate the consolidation process of subsoils. The effect of vacuum pressure is often considered as a loading/unloading cycle of mean effective stress, such that elastic rebound occurs after vacuum removal, which cannot explain the observed postconstruction settlement in the field. In this study, the stress state of subsoils subject to vacuum and surcharge preloading is analyzed and decomposed into two components: (a) geostatic consolidation at a different depth, and (b) loading/unloading in the minor principal stress direction. A series of consolidated drained triaxial tests is conducted to simulate the soil behaviour after vacuum removal. Results show that the contribution of unloading in the minor principal stress direction outweighs the magnitude of elastic rebound after vacuum removal, and hence continued settlement dominates. A field case for highways is provided to further demonstrate the proposed mechanism.