Moral Foundations of Spirituality and Religion Through Natural Language Processing
To explore the similarities/differences between the moral contexts in which scholars use the terms religion and spirituality, we use Moral Foundations Dictionary for Linguistic Analyses 2.0 (MFD), a dictionary developed to assess the moral content of text, and a Natural Language Processing algorithm...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of management, spirituality & religion Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 184 - 205 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion
01.03.2024
International Association of Management, Spirituality & Religion |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To explore the similarities/differences between the moral contexts in which scholars use the terms religion and spirituality, we use Moral Foundations Dictionary for Linguistic Analyses 2.0 (MFD), a dictionary developed to assess the moral content of text, and a Natural Language Processing algorithm (Word2Vec) that learns the semantic relationships in a corpus. The findings suggest that, except in the virtue words category of the Care foundation dictionary, religion semantically overlaps with a greater percentage of MFD words than does spirituality. Both religion and spirituality have greater semantic overlaps with virtue words than vice words; compared to religion, spirituality’s semantic overlaps with vice words are smaller. Spirituality has greater overlaps only with the MFD words for Care and Sanctity; religion has greater semantic overlaps with words for all foundations, particularly the “binding” foundations: Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity. Similarities notwithstanding, the moral contexts of religion and spirituality feature different aspects of morality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6086 1942-258X |
DOI: | 10.51327/WLON1757 |