Perception of Object Persistence: The Origins of Object Permanence in Infancy

A dominant account of object knowledge in infancy is based on the assumption that infants possess innate core knowledge of objects through which they reason about events and look longer at those that violate their expectations on the basis of this knowledge. In this article, we propose a perceptual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild development perspectives Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 7 - 13
Main Authors Bremner, J. Gavin, Slater, Alan M., Johnson, Scott P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1750-8592
1750-8606
DOI10.1111/cdep.12098

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A dominant account of object knowledge in infancy is based on the assumption that infants possess innate core knowledge of objects through which they reason about events and look longer at those that violate their expectations on the basis of this knowledge. In this article, we propose a perceptual model in which younger infants’ perception of object persistence is subject to greater perceptual constraints compared with infants a few months older, and in which young infants require a combination of cues to perceive object persistence across occlusion. Young infants perceive object persistence under limited conditions and over the early months, perception of persistence becomes more robust. The same analysis may be applied to cases in which stationary objects are occluded, including tasks assessing infants’ numerical competence. We argue that these perceptual developments within the first 6 months likely underpin the later development of cognitive principles, including object permanence.
Bibliography:U.K. Economic and Social Research Council - No. R000239979; No. RES-000-23-1341; No. RES-062-23-1757
ArticleID:CDEP12098
ark:/67375/WNG-K599XWWL-1
istex:43DD6622A9A49013F9FD56C8202B4396D7F2583F
The research in this article was supported by grants from the U.K. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC): R000239979, RES‐000‐23‐1341, and RES‐062‐23‐1757, to the first and second authors.
Gavin Bremner, Lancaster University; Alan Slater, Exeter University; Scott Johnson, University of California, Los Angeles.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1750-8592
1750-8606
DOI:10.1111/cdep.12098