The effectiveness of three strategies to reduce the influence of bias in evaluations of female leaders

This study tests the effectiveness of three strategies [structured free recall (SFR), source monitoring, and error management] to reduce the impact of raters' stereotypes on evaluations of female leaders. Results reveal several three‐way interactions indicating that that the strategies became m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied social psychology Vol. 45; no. 9; pp. 522 - 539
Main Authors Anderson, Amanda J., Ahmad, Afra S., King, Eden B., Lindsey, Alex P., Feyre, Rachel P., Ragone, Sara, Kim, Sooyeol
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study tests the effectiveness of three strategies [structured free recall (SFR), source monitoring, and error management] to reduce the impact of raters' stereotypes on evaluations of female leaders. Results reveal several three‐way interactions indicating that that the strategies became more effective as raters' implicit bias decreased. Findings show that the source monitoring and SFR methods were more effective than the error management strategy. The results have implications for improving opportunities for women to advance through the leadership ranks. This study adds to the literature by comparing multiple strategies to reduce the influence of individuals' biases in evaluations of women in leadership positions and revealing the importance of considering raters' implicit gender biases in evaluations.
Bibliography:istex:3BB23DFCB338FF6BBB825B67139E3D9C156708C7
ark:/67375/WNG-8B4719W3-8
ArticleID:JASP12317
ISSN:0021-9029
1559-1816
DOI:10.1111/jasp.12317