Drones as a Threat to Wildlife: YouTube Complements Science in Providing Evidence about Their Effect

Although drones are becoming very common in the skies, most concerns about their use are not focused on their possible impact on wildlife. We used the information available from the scientific literature on the effects of drones on wildlife and complement it with Internet (YouTube) information to ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental conservation Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 205 - 210
Main Authors Rebolo-Ifrán, Natalia, Graña Grilli, Maricel, Lambertucci, Sergio A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2019
Subjects
Animal behavior
Aquatic habitats
Habitats
Internet
Nature conservation
Recreational use
Research Paper
Scientific papers
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Wildlife
Wildlife habitats
RPA
UAV
wildlife disturbance
drone
YouTube
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Although drones are becoming very common in the skies, most concerns about their use are not focused on their possible impact on wildlife. We used the information available from the scientific literature on the effects of drones on wildlife and complement it with Internet (YouTube) information to evaluate whether recreational activities using drones produce behavioural responses from wildlife. Scientific papers specifically evaluating the effects of drones on wildlife are scarce but increasing. Nonetheless, we found abundant videos in which many species from different taxonomic groups and multiple countries presented behavioural responses to drone overflights. Furthermore, 26% of the species that were disturbed are included in one of the International Union for Conservation of Nature categories of threat. We found that wildlife that use aerial and terrestrial habitats are more likely to show a behavioural response than those occupying aquatic habitats. The Internet is becoming a source of evidence of disturbances to wildlife that should be considered, particularly for recreational activities. We advocate for the use of technology, but argue that funding and effort should be devoted to evaluating drone impacts on wildlife. We call for educational programmes for laypeople who use drones for recreation and for more research and regulations on their use in sensitive wildlife areas.
ISSN:0376-8929
1469-4387
DOI:10.1017/S0376892919000080