Seattle’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): Program effects on recidivism outcomes

•LEAD is a jail diversion program for persons suspected of low-level drug and prostitution offenses.•Compared to the system as usual, LEAD is associated with 60% lower odds of arrest and 39% lower odds of felony charges.•Findings suggest diverting offenders to supportive services reduces recidivism....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEvaluation and program planning Vol. 64; pp. 49 - 56
Main Authors Collins, Susan E., Lonczak, Heather S., Clifasefi, Seema L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•LEAD is a jail diversion program for persons suspected of low-level drug and prostitution offenses.•Compared to the system as usual, LEAD is associated with 60% lower odds of arrest and 39% lower odds of felony charges.•Findings suggest diverting offenders to supportive services reduces recidivism. Drug users and dealers frequently cycle through the criminal justice system in what is sometimes referred to as a “revolving door.” Arrest, incarceration and prosecution have not deterred this recidivism. Seattle’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program was established to divert these individuals to case management and supportive services instead of jail and prosecution. A nonrandomized controlled evaluation was conducted to examine LEAD effects on criminal recidivism (i.e., arrests, criminal charges). The sample included 318 people suspected of low-level drug and prostitution activity in downtown Seattle: 203 received LEAD, and 115 experienced the system-as-usual control condition. Analyses were conducted using logistic generalized estimating equation models over both the shorter term (i.e., six months prior and subsequent to evaluation entry) and longer term (i.e., two years prior to the LEAD start date through July 2014). Compared to controls, LEAD participants had 60% lower odds of arrest during the six months subsequent to evaluation entry; and both a 58% lower odds of arrest and 39% lower odds of being charged with a felony over the longer term. These statistically significant differences in arrests and felony charges for LEAD versus control participants indicated positive effects of the LEAD program on recidivism.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0149-7189
1873-7870
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.008