An Effective Mechanism to Mitigate Real-Time DDoS Attack

Computer networks are subject to an unprecedented number and variety of attack, the majority of which are distributed denial of service (DDoS). The nature and mechanisms employed in these DDoS attacks continually change, creating a significant challenge for detection and management. To address this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 8; pp. 126215 - 126227
Main Authors Abubakar, Rana, Aldegheishem, Abdulaziz, Faran Majeed, Muhammad, Mehmood, Amjad, Maryam, Hafsa, Ali Alrajeh, Nabil, Maple, Carsten, Jawad, Muhammad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Computer networks are subject to an unprecedented number and variety of attack, the majority of which are distributed denial of service (DDoS). The nature and mechanisms employed in these DDoS attacks continually change, creating a significant challenge for detection and management. To address this evolving nature of attacks, approaches are required that can effectively detect and mitigate emerging attacks. In this paper, we provide a mechanism that not only detects the presence of a DDoS attacks but also identifies the route of attack and commences a process of mitigation at the initial stage of identification. The proposed research involves an optimized SVM classification algorithm integrated with SNORT IPS to provide prevention mechanisms for the entire network when subject to DDoS attack. The proposed IPS method allows traffic identified as legitimate to pass through the network, whereas suspect traffic is flagged and has to go through an identification system. We present the algorithm with experimental results that show better performance than simple Snort IPS, Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), Back Propagation (BP), Chi-square, and PSO-SVM in terms of accuracy, exposure and specificity. These results show that the average accuracy rate of our method is 97 percent.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995820