Optimal Energy Harvesting of Large-Scale Wind Farm Using Marine Predators Algorithm

A new optimal control strategy for the grid side converter (GSC) and rotor side converter (RSC) of a doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) is developed in this paper using the Marine Predators algorithm (MPA). To accomplish this study, a comprehensive comparison between the suggested MPA-based contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 10; pp. 24995 - 25004
Main Authors Mohamed, Rania Gamal, Ebrahim, Mohamed Ahmed, Alaas, Zuhair Muhammed, Ahmed, M. M. R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A new optimal control strategy for the grid side converter (GSC) and rotor side converter (RSC) of a doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) is developed in this paper using the Marine Predators algorithm (MPA). To accomplish this study, a comprehensive comparison between the suggested MPA-based control strategy and a well matured Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) to enhance transient stability of large-scale wind systems has been presented. MPA is used to determine the optimal gains of proportional-integral (PI) controllers for GSC and RSC to ensure a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a large-scale wind farm. The proposed optimal control strategy is analyzed and verified via a benchmark 9-MW DFIG wind farm using MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation. The attained results of the suggested MPA-PI-based controllers are compared to the conventional PI-based MPPT controllers to validate the efficacy of the developed optimal control strategy. The superiority of the proposed MPA-PI and PSO-PI-based optimal controllers over the traditional PI regulators towards enhancing the DFIG system dynamic performance has been proved. The presented MPA-PI-based control scheme has been succeeded in extracting the maximum power of the DFIG wind farm with a reduced settling time of about 1.8% and overshooting range 97% lower than the conventional controller.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3156084