Prolonged Continuous Theta-burst Stimulation is More Analgesic Than ‘Classical’ High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

• Published in: Brain stimulation Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 135 - 141
• Main Authors: Moisset, Xavier, Goudeau, Simon, Poindessous-Jazat, Frédérique, Baudic, Sophie, Clavelou, Pierre, Bouhassira, Didier
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 2015
• Subjects: Adult; Analgesia - methods; Conditioned pain modulation; Cortical excitability; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology; Female; Humans; Male; Motor Cortex - physiology; Neural Inhibition - physiology; Neurology; Pain; Pain Threshold; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Theta Rhythm; Thêta-burst stimulation; Time Factors; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods; Cortical excitability; Thêta-burst stimulation; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Pain; Conditioned pain modulation
• ISSN: 1935-861X; 1876-4754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.006

Abstract Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) at high frequency (>5 Hz) induces analgesic effects, probably by activating pain modulation systems. A new rTMS paradigm – theta burst stimulation (TBS) – consists of bursts of three pulses at 50 Hz repeated five times per second. Like high frequency rTMS, both intermittent and prolonged continuous TBS (iTBS and pcTBS) lead to a facilitation of cortical excitability. Objectives (1) to evaluate the analgesic effects of neuronavigated iTBS and pcTBS, comparing them with those of classical high frequency rTMS (10 Hz) over the left M1, (2) to elucidate the role of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the antinociceptive effect of rTMS and (3) to investigate possible correlations between analgesia and cortical excitability. Methods Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in four experimental sessions, carried out in a random order (iTBS, pcTBS, 10 Hz rTMS or sham). Cold pain threshold, CPM and cortical excitability measurements were carried out before and after rTMS. Results We found that the analgesic effects of 10 Hz rTMS and pcTBS were significantly superior to those of sham rTMS. Moreover, pcTBS was significantly more effective than 10 Hz rTMS ( P  = 0.026). Analgesia did not seem to be driven by changes in CPM or cortical excitability. Conclusion Prolonged cTBS has considerable clinical potential, as it has a shorter treatment duration (by a factor 8) and stronger analgesic effects than the classical high frequency protocol. Studies in patients are required to confirm the potential of this new stimulation paradigm for clinical applications.