Professionalization of the public health workforce: scoping review and call to action

• Published in: European journal of public health Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 52 - 58
• Main Authors: Czabanowska, Katarzyna, Rodriguez Feria, Pablo, Kuhlmann, Ellen, Kostoulas, Polychronis, Middleton, John, Magana, Laura, Sutton, Gabriella, Goodman, Julien, Burazeri, Genc, Aleksandrova, Olga, Piven, Natalia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 04.10.2023; Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
• Subjects: Certification; Classification; Continuing professional development; Doctoral degrees; Enumeration; Formal organization; Levers; Literature reviews; Medical personnel; Policy making; Professionalization; Public health; Public Health Policy; Taxonomy; Workforce
• ISSN: 1101-1262; 1464-360X; 1464-360X
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad171

Abstract Background The ‘WHO-ASPHER Roadmap to Professionalizing the Public Health Workforce in the European Region’ provides recommendations for strategic and systematic workforce planning around professionalization levers including: (i) competencies, (ii) training and education, (iii) formal organization, (iv) professional credentialing and (v) code of ethics and professional conduct as well as taxonomy and enumeration. It was based on a literature review till 2016. This scoping review aims to explore how the professionalization was documented in the literature between 2016 and 2022. Methods Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we searched Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC via EBSCO and Google Scholar and included studies on professionalization levers. Four critical appraisal tools were used to assess qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies and grey literature. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used for reporting. Results Eleven articles included in this review spanned 61 countries, targeting undergraduate, master’s, doctoral degrees and continuing professional development. Most of these documents were reviews. About half provided a definition of the public health workforce; more than half covered the taxonomy and included information about competences, but the use of frameworks was sporadic and inconsistent. Formal organization and the necessity of a code of conduct for the public health workforce were acknowledged in only two studies. Conclusions In spite of some efforts to professionalize the public health workforce, this process is fragmented and not fully recognized and supported. There is an urgent need to engage policymakers and stakeholders to prioritize investments in strengthening the public health workforce worldwide.