Evaluation of monoclonal antibodies for generic detection of flaviviruses by ELISA

Three monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) specific for the envelope (E) protein of flaviviruses were evaluated for use in an antigen capture ELISA. Three combinations of Mabs and a combination of polyclonal antibodies (Pabs) were evaluated in antigen capture ELISAs for their ability to detect 18 flavivirus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of virological methods Vol. 62; no. 2; pp. 143 - 151
Main Authors Brown, J.M., Coates, D.M., Phillpotts, R.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Elsevier B.V 01.12.1996
Amsterdam Elsevier
New York, NY
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) specific for the envelope (E) protein of flaviviruses were evaluated for use in an antigen capture ELISA. Three combinations of Mabs and a combination of polyclonal antibodies (Pabs) were evaluated in antigen capture ELISAs for their ability to detect 18 flaviviruses. The Mab ELISAs detected 50% of flavivirus antigens with a sensitivity between 1 and 9 × 10 4 ng viral protein/ml, however, none of the ELISAs evaluated proved to be useful for generic detection of flaviviruses, being unable to detect tick-borne flaviviruses and some mosquito-borne flaviviruses. The inability of the ELISAs to detect tick-borne flaviviruses is thought to be due to the conformation of surface epitopes, which the Mabs were unable to recognise. This was again observed using recombinant TBE virus prM/E protein as antigen in direct and antigen capture ELISAs. The Mabs reacted with the prM/E protein when it was denatured by binding directly onto the solid phase, but the antibodies were unable to detect the native protein in antigen capture ELISAs. The antigen capture ELISAs evaluated in this study were considered to be unsuitable for the generic detection of flaviviruses, but may provide a sensitive diagnostic assay for specific flavivirus infection.
Bibliography:L73
9703056
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/S0166-0934(96)02095-2