Association between serum uric acid and prostate cancer risk in East Asian populations: a Mendelian randomization study

Purpose Previous observational studies showed that serum uric acid (SUA) was associated with prostate cancer, but the causal relationship is unclear. This study aimed to explore the potential causal association between SUA and prostate cancer risk using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in the E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of nutrition Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 1323 - 1329
Main Authors Deng, Yunyang, Huang, Junjie, Wong, Martin Chi Sang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Previous observational studies showed that serum uric acid (SUA) was associated with prostate cancer, but the causal relationship is unclear. This study aimed to explore the potential causal association between SUA and prostate cancer risk using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in the East Asian populations. Methods Publicly available summary-level genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data on SUA were obtained from a genome-wide meta-analysis of three Japanese cohorts (121,745 subjects). The GWAS data on prostate cancer were derived from Biobank Japan (109,347 subjects with 5,408 cases and 103,939 controls). A total of 34 SUA-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) ( P value < 5 × 10 –8 ) were identified as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary method to compute the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for per standard deviation increase in SUA. MR Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode were also applied to test the robustness of the results. Results Genetically predicted SUA was positively associated with prostate cancer risk using inverse variance weighted (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.00–1.26; P  = 0.043). The positive association was robust when MR Egger (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.01–1.34; P  = 0.048), weighted median (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.03–1.36; P  = 0.018), and weighted mode (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.01–1.29; P  = 0.041) were used. Conclusion There were potential causal associations between higher genetically predicted SUA levels and increased prostate cancer risk. Further, MR studies with more valid SNPs and more cancer cases are needed. Validation of the findings is also recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1436-6207
1436-6215
1436-6215
DOI:10.1007/s00394-022-03076-7