Infection in knee replacements after previous injection of intra-articular steroid
We reviewed 231 patients who had undergone total knee replacement with an AGC (Biomet) implant over a period of 2.5 years. After applying exclusion criteria and with some loss to follow-up, there were 144 patients available for study. These were divided into two groups; those who had received intra-...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume Vol. 88; no. 3; pp. 321 - 323 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
01.03.2006
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
Edition | British volume |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We reviewed 231 patients who had undergone total knee replacement with an AGC (Biomet) implant over a period of 2.5 years. After applying exclusion criteria and with some loss to follow-up, there were 144 patients available for study. These were divided into two groups; those who had received intra-articular steroid in the 11 months before surgery and those who had not. There were three deep infections, all of which occurred in patients who had received a steroid injection. The incidence of superficial infection was not significantly different in the two groups. Five patients had undergone investigation for suspected deep infection because of persistent swelling or pain and all of these had received an intra-articular injection pre-operatively. We conclude that the decision to administer intra-articular steroids to a patient who may be a candidate for total knee replacement should not be taken lightly because of a risk of post-operative deep infection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-620X 2049-4394 2044-5377 2049-4408 |
DOI: | 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.17136 |