Boundary work in task-shifting practices – a qualitative study of reablement teams

Health services worldwide have provided incentives for establishing teams to accommodate complex health care tasks, enhance patient outcomes and organizational efficiency, and compensate for shortages of health care professionals. Parallel to and partly due to the increased focus on teamwork, task s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiotherapy theory and practice Vol. 39; no. 10; pp. 2106 - 2119
Main Authors Eliassen, Marianne, Moholt, Jill-Marit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis Ltd 03.10.2023
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0959-3985
1532-5040
1532-5040
DOI10.1080/09593985.2022.2064380

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Health services worldwide have provided incentives for establishing teams to accommodate complex health care tasks, enhance patient outcomes and organizational efficiency, and compensate for shortages of health care professionals. Parallel to and partly due to the increased focus on teamwork, task shifting has become a health policy. Task shifting involves new tasks and responsibilities, which may result in social negotiations about occupational boundaries. The aim of this study was to explore how the division of tasks, responsibilities, and roles in reablement practices can appear as boundary work between physiotherapists (PTs) and home trainers (HTs). The study drew on data from fieldwork with seven Norwegian reablement teams, including observations and individual interviews with PTs and HTs. We conducted thematic analysis informed by a theoretical framework on professional boundaries. We identified two different practices, which we labeled as: i) "The engine and the assistant" and ii) "The symbiotic team." We drew on these practices and theory of boundary making and boundary blurring to interpret the results. The findings indicate that boundary-making processes may generate asymmetric power relations that may constrain autonomous work and job satisfaction in teams, whereas boundary-blurring processes may promote collaborative practices that enhance holistic approaches and mutual learning on reablement teams.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
ISSN:0959-3985
1532-5040
1532-5040
DOI:10.1080/09593985.2022.2064380