The longitudinal association between narcissism and problematic social networking sites use: The roles of two social comparison orientations

•A sample of college students were assessed at three time points over 22 months.•Narcissism at T1 was positively related to problematic SNS use at T3.•Ability comparison mediated the link between narcissism and problematic SNS use.•Opinion comparison did not mediate the narcissism-problematic SNS us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAddictive behaviors Vol. 145; p. 107786
Main Authors Hou, Xiangling, Ren, Shengtao, Rozgonjuk, Dmitri, Song, Lanjun, Xi, Juzhe, Mõttus, René
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A sample of college students were assessed at three time points over 22 months.•Narcissism at T1 was positively related to problematic SNS use at T3.•Ability comparison mediated the link between narcissism and problematic SNS use.•Opinion comparison did not mediate the narcissism-problematic SNS use relation. The present study aimed to explore whether the tendency to compare one’s abilities and opinions to those of others (social comparison orientation) could longitudinally mediate the association between narcissism and problematic SNS use. A total of 1,196 college students were assessed at three time points over 22 months. The results showed that narcissism at time 1 was positively related to problematic SNS use at time 3 and that ability comparison at time 2 longitudinally mediated the association between narcissism at time 1 and problematic SNS use at time 3, whereas the longitudinal mediating effect of opinion comparison at time 2 was not significant. These findings suggest that narcissism more distally and ability comparison more proximally may be risk factors for engaging in problematic SNS use, and it is important to distinguish between types of social comparisons in problematic SNS use behaviors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107786