Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing

• Published in: Hearing research Vol. 364; pp. 25 - 37
• Main Authors: Imsiecke, Marina, Krüger, Benjamin, Büchner, Andreas, Lenarz, Thomas, Nogueira, Waldo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.07.2018
• Subjects: Cochlear implant; Electric-acoustic stimulation; Forward masking; Ipsilateral masking; Residual hearing; Residual hearing; Cochlear implant; Forward masking; Electric-acoustic stimulation; Ipsilateral masking
• ISSN: 0378-5955; 1878-5891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.003

In order to investigate the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system, psychophysical forward masking experiments were conducted in cochlear implant users who had preserved acoustic hearing in the ipsilateral ear. This unique electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) population allowed the measurement of threshold recovery functions for acoustic or electric probes in the presence of electric or acoustic maskers, respectively. In the electric masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of acoustic probes was measured as a function of the time interval after the offset of the electric masker, i.e. the masker-to-probe interval (MPI). In the acoustic masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of electric probe stimuli was investigated under the influence of a preceding acoustic masker. Since electric pulse trains directly stimulate the auditory nerve, this novel experimental setup allowed the acoustic adaptation properties (attributed to the physiology of the hair cells) to be differentiated from the subsequent processing by more central mechanisms along the auditory pathway. For instance, forward electric masking patterns should result more from the auditory-nerve response to electrical stimulation, while forward acoustic masking patterns should primarily be the result of the recovery from adaptation at the hair-cell neuron interface. Electric masking showed prolonged threshold elevation of acoustic probes, which depended significantly on the masker-to-probe interval. Additionally, threshold elevation was significantly dependent on the similarity between acoustic stimulus frequency and electric place frequency, the electric-acoustic frequency difference (EAFD). Acoustic masking showed a reduced, but statistically significant effect of electric threshold elevation, which did not significantly depend on MPI. Lastly, acoustic masking showed longer decay times than electric masking and a reduced dependency on EAFD. In conclusion, the forward masking patterns observed for combined electric-acoustic stimulation provide further insights into the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system. For instance, the asymmetry in the amount of threshold elevation, the dependency on EAFD and the time constants for the recovery functions of acoustic and electric masking all indicate that there must be several processes with different latencies (e.g. neural adaptation, depression of spontaneous activity, efferent systems) that are involved in forward masking recovery functions. •Forward electric-acoustic masking showed prolonged elevation in probe thresholds.•Asymmetries between electric and acoustic masking were observed in the recovery functions.•Electric masking exhibited shorter decay times but higher threshold elevation.•Electric masking threshold elevation depended on the electric-acoustic frequency difference.