DSM-5 and culture: The need to move towards a shared model of care within a more equal patient–physician partnership

• Published in: Asian journal of psychiatry Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 89 - 91
• Main Author: Jacob, K.S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.2014
• Subjects: Culture; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; DSM-5; Humans; Internal Medicine; Mental disorders; Mental Disorders - diagnosis; Mental Disorders - ethnology; Mental Disorders - psychology; Mental Disorders - therapy; Mental Health Services; Physician-Patient Relations; Psychiatry; Mental disorders; Culture; DSM-5
• ISSN: 1876-2018; 1876-2026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2013.11.012

Abstract The universal models employed by psychiatry de-emphasise the role of context and culture. Despite highlighting the impact of culture on psychiatric diagnosis and management in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, most of the changes suggested remain in the introduction and appendices of the manual. Nevertheless, clinical and biological heterogeneity within phenomenological categories mandates the need to individualise care. However, social and cultural context, patient beliefs about causation, impact, treatment and outcome expectations are never systematically elicited, as they were not essential to diagnosis and classification. Patient experience and narratives are trivialised and the biomedical model is considered universal and transcendental. The need to elicit patient perspectives, evaluate local reality, assess culture, educate patients about possible interventions, and negotiate a shared plan of management between patient and clinician is cardinal for success. The biopsychosocial model, which operates within a paternalistic physician-patient relationship, needs to move towards a shared approach, within a more equal patient-clinician partnership.