Synthesis of seleno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione-based polymers for polymer solar cells
[Display omitted] ► Novel seleno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione-based π-conjugated polymers PSePDBDT1 and PSePDBDT2 were synthesized. ► The thermal, optical, and photovoltaic properties of PSePDBDT2 were evaluated. ► PSePDBDT2 exhibited a higher thermal stability than the corresponding sulfur-based PTPDBDT...
Saved in:
Published in | Synthetic metals Vol. 162; no. 17-18; pp. 1707 - 1712 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.10.2012
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
► Novel seleno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione-based π-conjugated polymers PSePDBDT1 and PSePDBDT2 were synthesized. ► The thermal, optical, and photovoltaic properties of PSePDBDT2 were evaluated. ► PSePDBDT2 exhibited a higher thermal stability than the corresponding sulfur-based PTPDBDT2. ► The bandgap of PSePDBDT2 was slightly narrower than that of PTPDBDT2. ► The power conversion efficiency of the devises based on PSePDBDT2 was 0.28%.
Novel π-conjugated polymers PSePDBDT1 and PSePDBDT2 containing seleno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione and benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene units were synthesized, and their thermal, optical and photovoltaic properties were compared with those of the corresponding thiophene-based polymer, PTPDBDT2, containing sulfur instead of selenium. PSePDBDT2 exhibited higher thermal stability and a narrower bandgap than PTPDBDT2. Using PSePDBDT2 or PTPDBDT2 as an electron donor and [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) as an electron acceptor, inverted-type bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices with the configuration ITO/TiOx/PSePDBDT2 or PTPDBDT2:PC61BM (1:2, w/w)/PEDOT:PSS/Au (ITO=indium tin oxide, TiOx=titanium oxide, PEDOT:PSS=poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrene sulfonic acid)) were fabricated. The preliminary power conversion efficiencies of the devices containing PSePDBDT2 and PTPDBDT2 were 0.28% and 1.54%, respectively, under simulated AM1.5 solar irradiation (77.8mW/cm2). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0379-6779 1879-3290 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.07.003 |