State-of-charge estimation and uncertainty for lithium-ion battery strings
•A new state-of-charge (SOC) convention to accurately represent the state of the battery.•The best SOC estimation method is proposed and validated for a string of batteries.•Basic understanding of SOC from materials in electrodes to multi-cell strings is explained.•Error functions from five SOC esti...
Saved in:
Published in | Applied energy Vol. 119; pp. 218 - 227 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
15.04.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •A new state-of-charge (SOC) convention to accurately represent the state of the battery.•The best SOC estimation method is proposed and validated for a string of batteries.•Basic understanding of SOC from materials in electrodes to multi-cell strings is explained.•Error functions from five SOC estimation methods are evaluated and compared.•Uncertainty on SOC estimation was estimated, discussed and explained.
The state-of-charge (SOC) estimation is of extreme importance for the reliability and safety of battery operation. How to estimate SOC and, to some degree, the SOC convention itself, is still a subject of great interest. Here a viable SOC convention valid for single cells and multi-cell strings is proposed and validated. Using a 3S1P string as an illustration in this work, the direct inference from a correct open circuit voltage versus SOC (OCV=f(SOC)) correspondence based on the proposed SOC convention is the best method for accurate SOC estimation among several possible approaches for strings. The thermodynamic aspect on this SOC convention is explained. Uncertainties in actual applications are also discussed. The understanding on this accurate SOC estimation approach shall facilitate reliable battery control and management. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.046 |