Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations

Theory creating and hypothesis testing are both critical components of social science, but the former is ultimately more important. Yet, in recent years, International Relations scholars have devoted less effort to creating and refining theories or using theory to guide empirical research. Instead,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of international relations Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 427 - 457
Main Authors Mearsheimer, John J., Walt, Stephen M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2013
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Careers
Citizens
Collectives
Conceptualization
Empirical Methods
Hypotheses
Hypothesis testing
Incentives
International Relations
International relations theory
Methodology
Policy making
Political theory
Scholarship
Social Sciences
Studies
policy-relevance
hypothesis testing
professional norms
scientific realism
cumulative knowledge
methodology
theory
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Theory creating and hypothesis testing are both critical components of social science, but the former is ultimately more important. Yet, in recent years, International Relations scholars have devoted less effort to creating and refining theories or using theory to guide empirical research. Instead, they increasingly focus on ‘simplistic hypothesis testing,’ which emphasizes discovering well-verified empirical regularities. Privileging simplistic hypothesis testing is a mistake, however, because insufficient attention to theory leads to misspecified empirical models or misleading measures of key concepts. In addition, the poor quality of much of the data in International Relations makes it less likely that these efforts will produce cumulative knowledge. This shift away from theory and toward simplistic hypothesis testing reflects a long-standing desire to professionalize and expand the International Relations field as well as the short-term career incentives of individual scholars. This tendency is also widening the gap between the ivory tower and the real world, making International Relations scholarship less useful to policymakers and concerned citizens. Unfortunately, this trend is likely to continue unless there is a collective decision to alter prevailing academic incentives.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1354-0661
1460-3713
DOI:10.1177/1354066113494320