Misused terms in analytical chemistry with emphasis on ultrasound application

A wide number of analytical terms have been applied erroneously for many years by analytical chemists, and they apply at present yet, by considering the time makes their use correct. The question is, may precedents validate the present use of incorrect scientific terms? Misused terms are found along...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of separation science Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 166 - 171
Main Author Luque de Castro, María Dolores
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A wide number of analytical terms have been applied erroneously for many years by analytical chemists, and they apply at present yet, by considering the time makes their use correct. The question is, may precedents validate the present use of incorrect scientific terms? Misused terms are found along the analytical process, starting with giving the name of the sample to the exiguous fraction of the original sample that reaches the detector or the high‐resolution equipment after sample pretreatment and sample preparation. All the steps of the analytical process are considered in this article, with special emphasis on sample preparation and, within this, on the use of ultrasound, mainly for assisting extraction more unequivocally named as leaching or lixiviation. A call of attention in this respect is considered by the author to be of help to the analytical community.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1615-9306
1615-9314
DOI:10.1002/jssc.202100479