Genomic‐scale comparison of sequence‐ and structure‐based methods of function prediction: Does structure provide additional insight?

A function annotation method using the sequence‐to‐structure‐to‐function paradigm is applied to the identification of all disulfide oxidoreductases in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. The method identifies 27 sequences as potential disulfide oxidoreductases. All previously known thioredoxins, gl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProtein science Vol. 10; no. 5; pp. 1005 - 1014
Main Authors Fetrow, Jacquelyn S., Siew, Naomi, Di Gennaro, Jeannine A., Martinez‐Yamout, Maria, Dyson, H. Jane, Skolnick, Jeffrey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 01.05.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A function annotation method using the sequence‐to‐structure‐to‐function paradigm is applied to the identification of all disulfide oxidoreductases in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. The method identifies 27 sequences as potential disulfide oxidoreductases. All previously known thioredoxins, glutaredoxins, and disulfide isomerases are correctly identified. Three of the 27 predictions are probable false‐positives. Three novel predictions, which subsequently have been experimentally validated, are presented. Two additional novel predictions suggest a disulfide oxidoreductase regulatory mechanism for two subunits (OST3 and OST6) of the yeast oligosaccharyltransferase complex. Based on homology, this prediction can be extended to a potential tumor suppressor gene, N33, in humans, whose biochemical function was not previously known. Attempts to obtain a folded, active N33 construct to test the prediction were unsuccessful. The results show that structure prediction coupled with biochemically relevant structural motifs is a powerful method for the function annotation of genome sequences and can provide more detailed, robust predictions than function prediction methods that rely on sequence comparison alone.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Article and publication are at www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.49201.
Reprint requests to: Jeffrey Skolnick, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 893 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO 63141; e-mail: skolnick@danforthcenter.org; fax: 314-812-8075.
Present address: Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Present addresses: GeneFormatics, Inc., 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1110/ps.49201