Intentional Swallowing of Foreign Bodies Is a Recurrent and Costly Problem That Rarely Causes Endoscopy Complications

• Published in: Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 8; no. 11; pp. 941 - 946
• Main Authors: Huang, Brian L, Rich, Harlan G, Simundson, Susan E, Dhingana, Mukesh K, Harrington, Colin, Moss, Steven F
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2010
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Deglutition; Deliberate Ingestion; Endoscopy - adverse effects; Endoscopy - economics; Esophagus - surgery; Female; Foreign Bodies; Foreign Bodies - diagnosis; Foreign Bodies - economics; Foreign Bodies - surgery; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Stomach - surgery; Therapeutic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Young Adult; BLPD; self-injurious behavior; foreign body; Foreign Bodies; FBI; SIB; Deliberate Ingestion; borderline personality disorder; ASPD; foreign body ingestion; antisocial personality disorder; FB; Therapeutic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
• ISSN: 1542-3565; 1542-7714
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.07.013

Background & Aims Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric foreign bodies (FBs) and all FBs lodged in the esophagus. We studied the poorly understood group of patients who intentionally ingest FBs. Methods Cases of intentional ingestion of FBs (n = 305) were identified, retrospectively, from an electronic endoscopy database and followed. Cases occurred among 33 different patients, who underwent endoscopy from October 1, 2001, to July 31, 2009 (39.0 cases/year); 79% were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Financial cost analysis was performed using hospital billing and cost systems. Results Commonly ingested FBs included pens (23.6%), batteries (9.2%), knives (7.2%), and razor blades (6.9%). Most endoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. FBs were commonly retrieved by snares (58.0%), rat-toothed forceps (14.4%), and nets (11.5%), assisted sometimes by use of overtubes (10.8%), and hoods (4.6%). FB extraction was unsuccessful at the initial endoscopy in only 20 cases; 2 cases eventually required surgical extraction. Minor complications occurred in 11 endoscopies. There were no deaths or perforations. The total estimated costs were $2,018,073 ($1,500,627 in hospital costs, $240,640 in physician fees, and $276,806 for security services). Costs were significantly higher for inpatients. Major payers were Medicare (48%) and Medicaid (31%). Conclusions Intentional FB ingestion occurs among a relatively small number of patients with psychiatric disorders and is costly. Endoscopic retrieval is relatively effective and safe, but often requires general anesthesia. These cases utilize significant hospital and fiscal resources. Attention should be focused on preventing these recurrent and costly episodes.