Multi-objective partial disassembly optimization based on sequence feasibility

► The multi-objective GA accounts for feasibility, costs/revenue, and env. impact. ► Disassembly operational cost and env. impact are taken into account. ► Infeasible sequences are used to converge to optimal or near-optimal solutions. ► Proposed feasibility metric is adjusted for near-feasible sequ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of manufacturing systems Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 281 - 293
Main Authors Rickli, Jeremy L., Camelio, Jaime A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► The multi-objective GA accounts for feasibility, costs/revenue, and env. impact. ► Disassembly operational cost and env. impact are taken into account. ► Infeasible sequences are used to converge to optimal or near-optimal solutions. ► Proposed feasibility metric is adjusted for near-feasible sequences. ► The method proved effective for a theoretical assembly and a coffeemaker assembly. A sustainable manufacturing system integrates production systems, consumer usage behavior, and End-of-Life (EoL) product value recovery activities. Facilitating multi-objective disassembly planning can be a step toward analyzing the tradeoffs between the environmental impact and profitability of value recovery. In this paper, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) heuristic is developed to optimize partial disassembly sequences based on disassembly operation costs, recovery reprocessing costs, revenues, and environmental impacts. EoL products may not warrant disassembly past a unique disassembly level due to limited recovered component market demand, minimal material recovery value, or minimal functional recovery value. The effectiveness of the proposed GA is first verified and tested using a simple disassembly problem and then applied to the traditional coffee maker disassembly case study. Analyses are disaggregated into multiple disassembly network optimization problems, one for each product subassembly, resulting in a bottom-up approach to EoL product partial disassembly sequence optimization.
ISSN:0278-6125
1878-6642
DOI:10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.11.005