Aesthetic Visual Quality Assessment of Paintings

This paper aims to evaluate the aesthetic visual quality of a special type of visual media: digital images of paintings. Assessing the aesthetic visual quality of paintings can be considered a highly subjective task. However, to some extent, certain paintings are believed, by consensus, to have high...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 236 - 252
Main Authors Li, Congcong, Chen, Tsuhan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.04.2009
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper aims to evaluate the aesthetic visual quality of a special type of visual media: digital images of paintings. Assessing the aesthetic visual quality of paintings can be considered a highly subjective task. However, to some extent, certain paintings are believed, by consensus, to have higher aesthetic quality than others. In this paper, we treat this challenge as a machine learning problem, in order to evaluate the aesthetic quality of paintings based on their visual content. We design a group of methods to extract features to represent both the global characteristics and local characteristics of a painting. Inspiration for these features comes from our prior knowledge in art and a questionnaire survey we conducted to study factors that affect human's judgments. We collect painting images and ask human subjects to score them. These paintings are then used for both training and testing in our experiments. Experimental results show that the proposed work can classify high-quality and low-quality paintings with performance comparable to humans. This work provides a machine learning scheme for the research of exploring the relationship between aesthetic perceptions of human and the computational visual features extracted from paintings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1932-4553
1941-0484
DOI:10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2015077