Initial mercury evaporation from experimental Ag–Sn–Cu amalgams containing Pd

This study examined the Hg evaporation during setting from experimental Ag–Sn–Cu alloy powders with and without Pd. Four series of alloy powders were fabricated to examine the effect on the Hg evaporation of the alloy compositions (all percentages in this report are weight percents): Pd (0–1.5), Cu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiomaterials Vol. 25; no. 16; pp. 3147 - 3153
Main Authors Koike, M., Ferracane, J.L., Adey, J.D., Fujii, H., Okabe, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examined the Hg evaporation during setting from experimental Ag–Sn–Cu alloy powders with and without Pd. Four series of alloy powders were fabricated to examine the effect on the Hg evaporation of the alloy compositions (all percentages in this report are weight percents): Pd (0–1.5), Cu (9.0–14.0), Ag (57.0–63.7), and Sn (24.9–29.5). These variations in composition produced alloy powders with γ-Ag 3Sn to β-Ag 4Sn ratios varying from 0.0 to 23.9. The total amounts of Hg released from 10 min after trituration were measured from cylindrical specimens (4×8 mm; n=4) at 37°C using a Hg vapor analyzer. The results were compared to those from commercial alloys (one high-Cu and one low-Cu alloy). All amalgams made from alloys containing 1.5% Pd exhibited lower Hg vapor release than any other amalgams, with the exception of the low-Cu amalgam. The results clearly showed that the alloy formulation affected the mercury evaporation behavior during setting of the resultant amalgams. A small addition of Pd to the alloy can produce amalgams with 50–60% less Hg vapor release during setting than a leading commercial high-Cu amalgam, Tytin.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0142-9612
1878-5905
DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.008