The use of lipases immobilized on poly(ethylene oxide) for the preparation of alkyl esters

Synthetic applications of lipases from Candida rugosa (CRL) and Pseudomonas sp. (PSL) immobilized on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The morphology and thermal properties of the lipases immobilized on the support were analyzed by microscopy and thermal analysis techniques. To evaluate the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProcess biochemistry (1991) Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 401 - 409
Main Authors da Silva Crespo, Janaina, Queiroz, Neide, da Graça Nascimento, Maria, Soldi, Valdir
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Synthetic applications of lipases from Candida rugosa (CRL) and Pseudomonas sp. (PSL) immobilized on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The morphology and thermal properties of the lipases immobilized on the support were analyzed by microscopy and thermal analysis techniques. To evaluate the efficiency of these systems, the esterification reaction of lauric acid (5 mmol) with n-pentanol (5 mmol) was studied. Reactional parameters such as time, temperature, enzyme concentration and organic media ( n-hexane) were evaluated. The degree of esterification increased as a function of time, temperature and concentration. The influence of organic solvents ( n-hexane, cyclohexane, n-heptane and acetone) was also considered for this reaction using a CRL/PEO system. The enzymatic resolutions of ( R, S)-2-octanol, ( R, S)-2-(4-chlorophenoxy) propionic and ( R, S)-2-bromo hexanoic acids were also studied. The R-alcohol was obtained with enantiometric excess of product (eep) >98% ( E=180). For the resolution of racemic acids, the enantiomeric excess for the substrate (ees) values were in the range 1–76% and the eep values were in the range 6–96% ( E=1, 1–118).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1359-5113
1873-3298
DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.026