Sexual Behaviors, Mobile Technology Use, and Sexting Among College Students in the American South
Purpose: To examine sexual, mobile technology, and sexting behaviors of college students. Design: A cross-sectional study design was employed. Setting: Study sites were 2 universities in the southern United States. Subjects: Data were collected from 254 participants via online survey of college stud...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of health promotion Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 87 - 96 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
01.01.2019
American Journal of Health Promotion |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose:
To examine sexual, mobile technology, and sexting behaviors of college students.
Design:
A cross-sectional study design was employed.
Setting:
Study sites were 2 universities in the southern United States.
Subjects:
Data were collected from 254 participants via online survey of college students.
Measures:
The survey included 268 items inclusive of measures from previously validated sources. Variables for this study included technology ownership/use, online/mobile dating site use, sexting behaviors/attitudes, and sexual behaviors. In particular, the Sexting Attitudes Scale has been previously validated with other researchers providing comparative data.
Analysis:
Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used for group comparisons. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine predictors of sexting behavior.
Results:
Of the 254 participants, over 80% had ever had sex, and participants were more likely to use condoms with partners who they were not in a committed relationship compared to those to whom they were committed (χ2 = 27.324, P = .0001). Seventy percent had ever sexted, and sexting attitudes ranged from approximately 80% agreeing that sexting is “risky” or can leave one “vulnerable” compared to 43% agreeing that sexting is “fun.” Sexting was associated with having multiple sexual partners (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-4.47) and sexually transmitted infection testing history (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.03-4.18).
Conclusion:
Study findings should be considered as interventionists plan sexual health and risk prevention programs for college students. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0890-1171 2168-6602 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0890117118779008 |