Attitude towards Risk, Prospect Variability, and the Value of Imperfect Information
The value of imperfect information as it depends upon the decision maker's attitude toward risk is investigated. When comparing the choices made and the prospects accepted by risk-averse decision makers with their risk-neutral counterparts, the definitive relationships both in the uninformed an...
Saved in:
Published in | Southern economic journal Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 194 - 209 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chapel Hill, N.C., etc
Southern Economic Association and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
01.10.1992
Southern Economic Association Southern Economic Association and the University of North Carolina |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The value of imperfect information as it depends upon the decision maker's attitude toward risk is investigated. When comparing the choices made and the prospects accepted by risk-averse decision makers with their risk-neutral counterparts, the definitive relationships both in the uninformed and informed situations do not necessarily lead to definitive statements signing the difference between the value of information to a risk-averter and the value of information to a risk-neutral decision maker. The key is that although the utilization of cost-free, non-useless information increases the expected utility for all decision makers, it does not necessarily leave the riskiness of the optimal prospects unchanged. This aspect is relevant only to the risk-averse decision maker's valuation. In the most general situation, in which both the prior and the preposterior prospects may be different, it is sufficient that the prior distribution of the posterior risk-neutral mean be Rothschild-Stiglitz more variable than the prior risk-neutral optimal prospect. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0038-4038 2325-8012 |
DOI: | 10.2307/1060525 |