Promoting Wellness for Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Why Using Numerous Drugs for Drug Side Effects Should Not Be First-Line Treatment

The controversy over androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer seems to have shifted over the past decade. The issue of adverse events or side effects now seems to dominate over that of clinical efficacy. However, this article provides evidence that questions the treatment of these side...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrologic clinics of North America Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 303 - 312
Main Authors Moyad, Mark A., MD, MPH, Roach, Mack, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The controversy over androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer seems to have shifted over the past decade. The issue of adverse events or side effects now seems to dominate over that of clinical efficacy. However, this article provides evidence that questions the treatment of these side effects with numerous prescription medications that have their own unique toxicity profile in patients with nonmetastatic disease. The hope is that patients will no longer be considered passive participants in the prevention and treatment of ADT side effects, now that information is available to help mitigate many of these effects.
ISSN:0094-0143
1558-318X
DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2011.05.001