Promoting Wellness for Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Why Using Numerous Drugs for Drug Side Effects Should Not Be First-Line Treatment
The controversy over androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer seems to have shifted over the past decade. The issue of adverse events or side effects now seems to dominate over that of clinical efficacy. However, this article provides evidence that questions the treatment of these side...
Saved in:
Published in | Urologic clinics of North America Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 303 - 312 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.08.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The controversy over androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer seems to have shifted over the past decade. The issue of adverse events or side effects now seems to dominate over that of clinical efficacy. However, this article provides evidence that questions the treatment of these side effects with numerous prescription medications that have their own unique toxicity profile in patients with nonmetastatic disease. The hope is that patients will no longer be considered passive participants in the prevention and treatment of ADT side effects, now that information is available to help mitigate many of these effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-0143 1558-318X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.05.001 |