Review of Punching Shear Behaviour of Flat Slabs Reinforced with FRP Bars

• Published in: IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 245; no. 3; pp. 32064 - 32070
• Main Authors: Mohamed, Osama A., Khattab, Rania
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol IOP Publishing 01.10.2017
• Subjects: Bars; Building codes; Concrete; Concrete slabs; Design standards; Fiber reinforced concretes; Fiber reinforced polymers; Glass fiber reinforced plastics; Life cycle costs; Maintenance costs; Punching; Punching shear; Rebar; Reinforcing steels; Service life; Stiffness; Structural members
• ISSN: 1757-8981; 1757-899X
• DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/3/032064

Using Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars to reinforce two-way concrete slabs can extend the service life, reduce maintenance cost and improve-life cycle cost efficiency. FRP reinforcing bars are more environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional reinforcing steel. Shear behaviour of reinforced concrete structural members is a complex phenomenon that relies on the development of internal load-carrying mechanisms, the magnitude and combination of which is still a subject of research. Many building codes and design standards provide design formulas for estimation of punching shear capacity of FRP reinforced flat slabs. Building code formulas take into account the effects of the axial stiffness of main reinforcement bars, the ratio of the perimeter of the critical section to the slab effective depth, and the slab thickness on the punching shear capacity of two-way slabs reinforced with FRP bars or grids. The goal of this paper is to compare experimental data published in the literature to the equations offered by building codes for the estimation of punching shear capacity of concrete flat slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Emphasis in this paper is on two North American codes, namely, ACI 440.1R-15 and CSA S806-12. The experimental data covered in this paper include flat slabs reinforced with GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP bars. Both ACI 440.1R-15 and CSA S806-12 are shown to be in good agreement with test results in terms of predicting the punching shear capacity.