Anorectal manometry with water-perfused catheter in healthy adults with no functional bowel disorders
Anorectal manometry provides an objective assessment of anal sphincter pressure and rectal sensitivity and anorectal reflexes in response to distension. However, its clinical utility is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols and normative data from healthy subjects. Previous studies have used...
Saved in:
Published in | Colorectal disease Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 220 - 225 |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Anorectal manometry provides an objective assessment of anal sphincter pressure and rectal sensitivity and anorectal reflexes in response to distension. However, its clinical utility is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols and normative data from healthy subjects. Previous studies have used water‐perfused systems in normal subjects, but some adopted a rapid pull‐through technique; others did not evaluate rectal sensations and others did not carefully exclude patients with functional bowel disorders.
Objective To evaluate anorectal function in healthy adults without functional bowel disorders, using a water‐perfused system with the stationary technique in order to obtain normative values for anorectal manometry.
Method Fifty‐two healthy volunteers with no Rome II diagnostic criteria for functional bowel disorders, including only nulliparous women, underwent anorectal manometry with a water‐perfused system, according to a standardized protocol.
Results Maximum squeeze pressure of the anal sphincter as well as the area under the pressure‐time curve during squeeze was significantly lower in women than men (P < 0.01), while sphincter length, resting pressure, volume thresholds for reflex inhibitory recto‐anal and rectal sensations were similar.
Conclusions This study describes a protocol for stationary anorectal manometry using a water‐perfused system, and a method for analysing the various parameters obtained during the procedure, as recently suggested in the international literature. It supplies normative data obtained in a population of healthy subjects including nulliparous women, with no functional bowel disorders. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-6ZCTCNG5-S ArticleID:CODI1787 istex:F6C164653F792B64EB237B1D26F230CD86633A52 Franco Barzaghi Corrado Bottini Gruppo Lombardo per lo Studio della Motilità Intestinale Guido Missale Gastroenterology Unit, San Gerardo de’ Tintori Hospital, Monza. Sandro Passaretti Gastroenterology Unit, Busto Arsizio Hospital. Marco Dinelli Luigi Gianfrate Giovanni Viviani Valeriano Castagna a b Daniela Fossati c Sara Bonecco Surgery Unit, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Gallarate. d e f g h i Eugenio Limido Elena Strada Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como. Gastroenterology Unit, Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan. Maura Corsetti S.Orsola‐Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Brescia. Digestive Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia. Gaetano Tessera Franco Radaelli Enrico Strocchi Domenico Della Casa Seriate Hospital. Roberto Antonio Noris Gastroenterology Unit, Multizonale di Circolo Hospital, Varese. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01787.x |