The influence of lead indicator strength on the use of nonfinancial measures in performance management: Evidence from CEO compensation schemes

Nonfinancial measures (NFMs) are a common feature of strategic performance management frameworks. We examine the role of one widely used NFM: customer satisfaction, in one aspect of strategic performance management: CEO compensation schemes. Drawing on agency theory precepts, we hypothesize that the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStrategic management journal Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 826 - 844
Main Authors Connell, Vincent O', Sullivan, Don O'
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.06.2014
John Wiley & Sons
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Nonfinancial measures (NFMs) are a common feature of strategic performance management frameworks. We examine the role of one widely used NFM: customer satisfaction, in one aspect of strategic performance management: CEO compensation schemes. Drawing on agency theory precepts, we hypothesize that the extent to which firms link CEO compensation to customer satisfaction is influenced by satisfaction's ability to act as a leading indicator of future profitability (lead indicator strength). We further hypothesize that the extent to which customer satisfaction's lead indicator strength influences the weighting of satisfaction in CEO compensation schemes has a positive influence on future shareholder value. Our empirical results offer strong support for both hypotheses and extend research on the use and efficacy of NFMs in CEO compensation schemes.
Bibliography:ArticleID:SMJ2124
Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia
istex:8FE609B1814412B63BAFAB9A89BE3623345EB7B4
Thomas J. Moran Research Fellowship
UCD School of Business
ark:/67375/WNG-RR8V5GQ1-N
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.2124