Quantitative analysis of diaphragm motion during fluoroscopic sniff test to assist in diagnosis of hemidiaphragm paralysis

The current imaging gold standard for detecting paradoxical diaphragm motion and diagnosing hemidiaphragm paralysis is to perform the fluoroscopic sniff test. The images are visually examined by an experienced radiologist, and if one hemidiaphragm ascends while the other descends, then it is describ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiology case reports Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 1750 - 1754
Main Authors Chow, Jacky, Hatem, Muhammed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.05.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current imaging gold standard for detecting paradoxical diaphragm motion and diagnosing hemidiaphragm paralysis is to perform the fluoroscopic sniff test. The images are visually examined by an experienced radiologist, and if one hemidiaphragm ascends while the other descends, then it is described as paradoxical motion, which is highly suggestive of hemidiaphragm paralysis. However, diagnosis can be challenging because diaphragm motion during sniffing is fast, paradoxical motion can be subtle, and the analysis is based on a 2-dimensional projection of a 3-dimensional surface. This paper presents a case of chronic left hemidiaphragm elevation that was initially reported as mild paradoxical motion on fluoroscopy. After measuring the elevations of the diaphragms and modeling their temporal correlation using Gaussian process regression, the systematic trend of the hemidiaphragmatic motion along with its stochastic properties was determined. When analyzing the trajectories of the hemidiaphragms, no statistically significant paradoxical motion was detected. This could potentially change the prognosis if the patient was to consider diaphragm plication as treatment. The presented method provides a more objective analysis of hemidiaphragm motions and can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy.
ISSN:1930-0433
1930-0433
DOI:10.1016/j.radcr.2022.02.083