Mapping of Superficial Extremity Veins: Normal Diameters and Trends in a Vascular Patient-Population

• Published in: Ultrasound in medicine & biology Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 190 - 194
• Main Authors: Spivack, Dan E, Kelly, Patrick, Gaughan, John P, van Bemmelen, Paul S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.2012; Elsevier
• Subjects: Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Biological and medical sciences; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management; Extremities - blood supply; Extremities - diagnostic imaging; Female; Hemodialysis; Humans; Intensive care medicine; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Leg revascularization; Male; Medical sciences; Minnesota; Radiology; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); Reference Values; Superficial veins; Ultrasonography - statistics & numerical data; Vein-mapping; Veins - diagnostic imaging; Superficial veins; Leg revascularization; Vein-mapping; Hemodialysis; Human; Cartography; Nuclear medicine; Leg; Extrarenal dialysis; Blood vessel; Radiology; Circulatory system; Biomedical engineering; Superficial vein
• ISSN: 0301-5629; 1879-291X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.11.008

Abstract Ultrasonic measurement of superficial extremity veins is a common procedure. To establish normal values for vein-size in a population of vascular patients and to assess if measurements remain unchanged over time, we analyzed a database with results of 28,130 measurements in 2420 separate saphenous and 3206 cephalic veins. Mean size of the great saphenous vein ranges from 2.3 mm to 4.4 mm but did not follow a tapering pattern as is often assumed. The distal calf segment is smaller than the ankle segment. The mean cephalic vein size in the upper arm (2.4 mm) was smaller than at the antecubital level (2.7 mm). A decrease in vein diameter over time was noted in many locations and this reached statistical significance ( p < 0.005 for the thigh segment). The clinical significance of this is a need to repeat ultrasonic vein-mapping if more than a year elapses between ultrasound and surgical vein harvest.