Comparison of magnetic resonance images and the histopathological findings of lesions induced by interstitial laser photocoagulation in the brain

Interest has developed in using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to monitor the volume of tissue destroyed by interstitial laser photocoagulation (ILP). In these experiments, ILP was induced in the normal brains of 9 anesthetized cats by delivering 1.5 W of continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser energy (1,064...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 45
Main Authors Tracz, R A, Wyman, D R, Little, P B, Towner, R A, Stewart, W A, Schatz, S W, Wilson, B C, Pennock, P W, Janzen, E G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 1993
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Interest has developed in using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to monitor the volume of tissue destroyed by interstitial laser photocoagulation (ILP). In these experiments, ILP was induced in the normal brains of 9 anesthetized cats by delivering 1.5 W of continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser energy (1,064 nm) from a single 400-microns core optical fiber for 1,000 s. The irradiations were monitored using proton spin-echo MR imaging during and immediately after ILP and at postirradiation survival times of 2, 5, and 14 days. At 2 days postirradiation, the necrotic thermal lesion consisted of a central cavity surrounded by 2 concentric zones of coagulative necrosis, one dense and the other dispersed. The lesion shrank and the zonal appearance became less obvious over the 14 day survival period. An enhancing halo on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images acquired immediately postirradiation best approximated the total lesion diameter at 2 days. These images also indicated that the volume of tissue destroyed during ILP corresponded better to the necrotic volume determined at 2 days than at 5 days and 14 days postirradiation. T2-weighted images acquired during and immediately after ILP consistently underestimated the total lesion diameter at 2 days.
ISSN:0196-8092
DOI:10.1002/lsm.1900130110