Management of Postoperative Pain after Elective Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of a Neurosurgical Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program

• Published in: International journal of medical sciences Vol. 17; no. 11; pp. 1541 - 1549
• Main Authors: Qu, Liang, Liu, Bolin, Zhang, Haitao, Sankey, Eric W, Chai, Wei, Wang, Binrong, Li, Zhengmin, Niu, Jiangtao, Zhao, Binfang, Jiang, Xue, Ye, Lin, Zhao, Lanfu, Zhang, Yufu, Zheng, Tao, Xue, Yafei, Chen, Lei, Chen, Long, Han, Haijing, Liu, Wenjuan, Li, Ruigang, Gao, Guodong, Wang, Xuelian, Wang, Yuan, He, Shiming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia Ivyspring International Publisher Pty Ltd 01.01.2020; Ivyspring International Publisher
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics; Analgesics - therapeutic use; Cardiovascular disease; Clinical trials; Consent; Craniotomy - adverse effects; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Ethics; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Length of stay; Male; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Neurosurgery; Pain; Pain management; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy; Patients; Perioperative care; Postoperative Care; Postoperative period; Prospective Studies; Recovery (Medical); Research Paper; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Young Adult; Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); pain management; neurosurgery; elective craniotomy; outcomes
• ISSN: 1449-1907; 1449-1907
• DOI: 10.7150/ijms.46403

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the management of postoperative pain after elective craniotomies. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neurosurgical center of Tangdu Hospital (Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China). A total of 129 patients undergoing craniotomies between October 2016 and July 2017 were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing an ERAS protocol to a conventional postoperative care regimen. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score assessed by a verbal numerical rating scale (NRS). Patients in the ERAS group had a significant reduction in their postoperative pain scores on POD 1 compared to patients in the control group (p < 0.05). More patients (n = 44, 68.8%) in the ERAS group experienced mild pain (NRS: 1 to 3) on POD1 compared with patients (n = 23, 35.4%) in the control group (p < 0.05). A further reduction in pain scores was also observed on POD 2 and maintained on POD 3 in the ERAS group compared with that in the control group. In addition, the median postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly decreased with the incorporation of the ERAS protocol compared to controls (ERAS: 4 days, control: 7 days, P<0.001). The implementation of a neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy patients has significant benefits in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing recovery leading to early discharge after surgery compared to conventional care. Further evaluation of this protocol in larger, multi-center studies is warranted.